Marian Seldes, captured by Dan Winters |
Marian Seldes waltzed through the world to a
composition only she could hear and only she could transcribe. Proudly not of
this world, she was regal and positive and ready to worship talent and people
in need and people who wanted the world to work. Marian was also an intelligent
woman, and fully aware of the performances she was giving both on and off the
stage, and she made no apologies, even as she confessed that she was frequently
teased, parodied, ridiculed. She told me once, “I guess they can make fun of
me. I’m in my own world, but my world works, and I want everyone to be in this
world, to be their best, to reach toward their dreams.”
In Rick Rodgers’ grisly, scabrous
documentary marian (the title perhaps
made so small, uncapped, because the
goal of the film is to diminish its subject), Marian is abused for nearly half
an hour, and we watch in horror as dementia overtakes her and as her avaricious
daughter laughs at the diminution of her mother and refutes the way of thinking
that sustained her. Early clips of Marian offering intelligent, honest
evaluations of herself are dark and gritty and badly lit, jumpy, amateurish,
but when we jump to the frightened, wide-eyed Marian, the images are lit as if
in a stadium, the focus sharp, and there is Marian, so often elegant and
controlled in her working years, asleep or alarmed, clearly in no condition to
offer consent for this violation. A home attendant brings her the phone and
pokes at her face as if looking for nits, and when I pointed this out to
Rodgers, his defense was that “it happened. That was real. I didn’t plan it or
tell her to do that,” a defense that I find as morally offensive as this film
itself.
What must be stated is that marian is not a film, not a documentary,
but an invasion, a protracted abuse of a woman who is not defended at any point
by those many peers and students who could let us know that her way of thinking
and living—fabulist and ornate and occasionally annoying—nonetheless led a
number of people to work and live in ways they might never have considered.
Instead, we have the talking, angry head of Katharine Andres, Marian’s daughter, her
over-plucked eyebrows like pitchforks, tightly telling us that her mother was
terrifying, that they always performed, that Marian lived to worship, while she
lives to call things as they are. If nothing else, this film will lead many to
immediately sign up for a life of denial and worship, particularly if truth, so
to speak, crafts someone like this unreliable, angry witness.
And now my disclaimers and the back story:
I met Marian Seldes in November of 1978,
when my high-school drama club spent Thanksgiving week in New York seeing plays
and musicals, and I went backstage at the Music Box, where Marian was appearing
in Ira Levin’s Deathtrap, to have her
autograph my copy of her autobiography The
Bright Lights, which had just been published. At that time I wanted to be
an actor, and Marian went out of her way to secure me an audition at Juilliard
(I had missed deadlines), and we began to speak by phone and write to each
other on a regular basis. Why? I don’t know: It was in Marian’s nature to reach
out and help people, and she often came to consider them friends. When I
eventually wrote a letter to Tennessee Williams and he agreed to meet me for
lunch in New Orleans in 1982, it was Marian to whom the playwright placed a
call, to ask if I was a good pick to entrust. Marian told him I was. When I
eventually moved to New York and to begin interviewing people on behalf of
Tennessee Williams (an assignment he had given me), Marian made calls and wrote
letters and secured interviews for me with dozens of people. She made the book
I wrote—Follies of God: Tennessee
Williams and the Women of the Fog (Knopf)—possible: She was its heart and its
guiding angel. So I am letting you know now that I am not objective in my
disdain for this noxious little film, but unlike its director and producer,
Rick Rodgers, I will clearly make my case. For those who think I cannot write
well or truly about this film, this should be where you get off.
I first became aware of Rick Rodgers when
I saw him appear with Marian in Terrence McNally’s Dedication Or the Stuff of Dreams at Primary Stages in 2005. Marian
told me he had asked if he could make a documentary about her late-life
resurgence. The film was to be called “The Third Act of Marian Seldes,” and
Marian told me “It’s about this incredible luck I have had: Marrying Garson
[Kanin], working so often and so well, having so much.” This was the assumption
of several people who agreed to be interviewed by Rodgers, and a trailer that
appeared several years ago featured their faces and their testimonies to
Marian, her unique way of thinking; her link to a theatre long gone; her
traditions; her gifts to her students. There was a lovely anecdote from
playwright John Guare, in which he related that Marian had called him to say
that Garson was unlikely to survive the night, and she wanted his final hours
to be in conversation with another playwright. Guare went to the apartment and
granted Marian her wish. That testimony is nowhere to be found in this film,
and Guare, along with Edward Albee, Nathan Lane, Tina Howe, Joe Mantello, Tony
Kushner, Elizabeth Marvel, and Terrence McNally, is a mere blip, a voiceover
lost in the shuffle of bad images and bad intentions.
Nathan Lane and Marian Seldes in Terrence McNally's Dedication or The Stuff of Dreams (2005) |
After eight years of following Marian
around the city and her apartment, Rodgers has assembled a film (I use the term
loosely) that never decides what it is or what it intends to do. Regardless of
Rodgers’ intentions, the effects of the film are horrifying, and it is nothing
but a sort of snuff film poring over the face of an actress we are losing to
dementia and the greed of her daughter and her filmmaker.
Consider this: Katharine Andres, Marian’s
daughter and only child, tells us that Marian’s husband, a producer named
Julian Claman, was abusive and unfaithful and unpleasant. Marian told others
this, including Alex Witchel, who wrote a wonderful profile of Marian for the
New York Times in 2010, before Marian
descended fully into her decline. Andres castigates her mother for not seeking
help in the marriage, because to do so would be to admit that her life and her
marriage were not perfect. Andres also claims that she and Seldes left their
apartment daily in the act of performing the roles of perfect mother and
daughter. There is a legitimate charge here—a daughter recalling that reality
was a hazy concept in her life. I have no doubt that this affected her as a
child, and it clearly still rankles her as an adult. However, who is present to
offer a balancing view? Did Rodgers, who has miles of film, never discuss this
with Seldes? Why didn’t he reference the Witchel article in which Marian admits
she does not recognize the person she was in that marriage? Marian was not
oblivious to her avoidance of reality in various ways: She loved to quote Ruth
Gordon (the first wife of Garson Kanin), who often told aspiring actors given disparaging
news or facing odd effects in the mirror to “Never face facts.” Ruth Gordon,
like Marian Seldes, like Katharine Hepburn, like Tennessee Williams, crafted
her own reality that allowed her to have the career we now know and remember.
People have often ridiculed Marian for her romanticism of the past and her
refusal to face negative facts (never in my four decades of friendship with
Marian did she ever voice a criticism of her former husband or her daughter),
and they are entitled to their opinions: They could, in fact, have been in this
film voicing them, if Marian had been able to defend them, as well as various
of her students, who credit her way of thinking and exalting with bringing them
to a full creative fruition. There is none of that. Instead, we see Katharine
Andres in close-up, tight and pinched and smug, a villager from Shirley Jackson’s
“The Lottery,” her hands full of rocks, claim that Marian shook her by the
shoulders, spanked her, and withheld affection if she was disappointed in her
daughter. These comments are stated over appropriated images—distorted,
bleached—from an episode of the 1960s series East Side/West Side, in which Marian is seen coddling a daughter,
but also walking toward someone to slap them At that point, marian seems to veer toward becoming a Mommie Dearest, albeit of the Theatre
Wing, Upper West Side division. As someone who often disappointed Marian with
my cynicism or failure to believe in others, I can imagine that life with
Katharine must have been a drag and a judgment, since anger and criticism seem
to be staples of her diet. When Andres says that Marian, vacuuming the
apartment (no doubt before heading to the theatre), looks at her and says “I’m
not a maid, and you’re not a princess,” I wondered if the film might then be
about the unbalanced daughter, expecting impossible things from a parent. I
have shown this film to dozens of people and all of them can recall a similar
exchange with a parent, and none of them considered it odd or abusive, and none
of them would state it publicly about a parent, dead or living. Then I thought
the film might be about lies on the parts of both mother and daughter, but my
confusion is nothing compared to that of the filmmaker.
Rodgers claims that he strenuously worked to
create a balanced portrait, but he is either a liar or incompetent, probably
both. To have Andres spout her poisons and to then cut to an ebullient and
annoying cabaret singer yelling into Marian’s face is not a balance to the
slander. Rodgers claims that these visitors to Marian’s apartment were culled
from a list of “acceptable” people provided by Andres and Martha Wilson, an
assistant to Kanin and to Marian, and both have a lot to answer for. Rodgers
provides no information about these visitors, and they do not speak “for her,”
as he claims: They speak or shout or sing at
her, like a bad League audition or an immorally visited therapy session. A
student and friend of Marian’s visited her and considered the visit a private
privilege, valuable time with a sick mentor who had changed her life. It was
not a career moment, or something to be shared in a film or on Instagram. It
was sacred, private.
But here you can see Donald Corren, a
student of and friend to Marian, sitting close to her and three cameras, Marian’s
expressive hands touching his handsome face, struggling for words. She asks him
to sing. If Rodgers had cared more and were more diligent, he might have
learned that Corren studied at Juilliard with Marian, and that he took Marian
to Café des Artists for a dinner Marian spoke of for years. Marian rhapsodized
about his talent, his kindness, and she turned me into a fan of his work. You
won’t learn a speck of this in the film, and Corren isn’t even offered a credit
on the screen as he bonds with Seldes. Neither is Charlotte Booker, a wonderful
actress who sits with Marian and tries to remind her of words that were
important in her life: “angel” and “beautiful” and “birds,” the term of
endearment she offered her students and friends. Booker’s face is full of
empathy and caring and sadness, but did we need cameras shoved so closely and
for so long? It’s touching to see Marian fondle her pearls with wonder,
childlike, but what is being said here? Once you have established that Marian
has been lost to dementia, why is it belabored?
The worst scene is that of an actress—unskilled,
sepulchral—shouting verse into Marian’s face, and it becomes her time, an audition of sorts, a
boasting. The visiting actress comments on the scary winds, and Rodgers shoots
Marian’s still, silent face in shadows. It’s tasteless and horrifying. In fact,
there are so many shots of Marian’s eyeballs, pores, whiskers, chattering
teeth, and fingers scratching and tapping that I had to keep stopping and
re-starting the film.
Earlier shots of a functioning Seldes, shot
darkly and as if on damaged film, often capture only her voice, the camera on
an empty chair as she talks on the phone, calling people “darling” and
rhapsodizing about plans. In non-capped, pretentious titles we’ll read two thousand five or two thousand seven, as if Marguerite
Duras were in the room prepping us for the bomb (dementia) soon to follow. Why
the empty chair? The only empty chair involved in this film is the one in which
the director sat. Rodgers follows Marian about her apartment, and he features
comments about Central Park looking like a “dream,” and Marian admitting she
isn’t a good houseguest or hostess, and she only wants to get home. He seems to
be painting her as dotty. When Marian speaks of how the theatre is a healing
art and that students often grew to be beautiful or handsome through the
creation of a character, Rodgers cuts to amateurish footage he cadged while in
McNally’s Dedication, in which
Marian, as a woman dying of cancer, wore a convincing wig that conveyed a
balding pate, and the film seems soaked in urine, yellow highlights spotting the
screen. Is Rodgers punking Seldes? Refuting her claim? We’ll never know,
because, despite his claims of “balance,” he does not then cut to a student of
Marian’s –say, Kevin Kline or Laura Linney or Patti LuPone or Kevin Spacey or
Frances Conroy—who could testify to the power and truth of her sentiments. No,
we just get the Satanic daughter, grinning and laughing about her mother’s
eternal silence, while attendants shove things around Marian, who clutches a
stuffed animal and sleeps, unaware of what is being done to her.
Marian Seldes was romantic, a sentimentalist,
and it is possible a film might have been made about a mother and a daughter
who were at emotional odds: A dreamer and a realist (“I’m not worshipful,”
Andres brags) locked in a battle of beliefs; a daughter envious of the
attention and love her mother received and gave to others, but could not give
to her. There’s a story there, but it does not make to the screen with marian. I often visited with Marian, and
she had durable boxes in her apartment for virtually every production in which
she appeared. A box devoted to her first appearance on the stage—at the old
Metropolitan Opera House, in Petrushka, in
1942, contained small circles of colored paper that had been snow, photographs,
a playbill. A box devoted to Ondine,
from 1954, and starring Audrey Hepburn and directed by Alfred Lunt, contained
letters and photographs. A lot of this was cleared out by Marian’s daughter and
son-in-law, for whom Marian was a burden and an ATM machine, and incinerated or
dumped on Central Park South. Awards won by Marian have shown up on eBay and at
flea markets.
One of Marian’s final appearances in New
York is shown here—a reading at the 92nd Street Y in celebration of
Tennessee Williams on his centennial. Produced by the Provincetown Tennessee
Williams Festival, a bacchanal of non-talent and ambition, a group of unwanted "artists" who have claimed Tennessee Williams as their property, Marian appears
unkempt and shaky, not even removing her coat. Several people who were there
that evening thought she should leave, but the producers had sold tickets on
Marian’s name, so they pushed her out on the stage, where she floundered,
frightened and confused, until she is finally, after fifteen interminable
minutes, pulled from the stage. Several of Marian’s friends had urged her over
the years to not attend to the various circle jerks of non-talent, non-theatre
in the city—Food for Thought, Symphony Space—that called on her constantly,
used her up, sent her on her way. But Marian always responded to those who
needed her, so in addition to watching people plaster their ambitions all over
Marian’s apartment, we see an example of people abusing Marian through their
own paltry ambitions, even at her peril. The video of this travesty did not
appear on YouTube until several weeks after Marian’s death, and like this film,
it is a terrible memory to have of this wonderful, generous actress.
Marian believed in and loved Rick Rodgers.
She told me he was honorable and that he could be trusted. For this reason I
promoted his film-in-progress, and I offered to help him, as Marian taught me,
in any way. Then I saw the film, several times, and I had to tell him that I
could not support it, and I had to defend my friend and deride his film for the
act of abuse I think it is. Rodgers asked me to consider the time and money he
had spent on the film, and he wondered how I could sleep at night. While my
sleep is really of no concern to Rodgers, I had to tell him that my sleep would
be interrupted far more if I failed to call him out on his assault on my
friend, his exaltation of an unbalanced, rapacious daughter who dominates a
film bearing her mother’s name. I told him I thought he was honorable, but I
was wrong. Rodgers replied “You don’t know me—and you never will.” All I can be
grateful for at this point after seeing this film is that I have this promise
from Rodgers in writing.
© 2017 James Grissom
Comments
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments. The moderators will try to respond to you within 24 hours.